EU trade policy digest January–March 2024
Published by AGRINFO on
Recent developments in EU trade policy
European Commission: Negotiations and agreements
Update
A summary of progress made in EU trade negotiations with low- and middle-income countries, and of key developments in trade policy.
What is changing?
EU trade negotiations with low- and middle-income countries
India
The EU and India are negotiating three separate agreements related to trade, investment, and the protection of geographical indications. At the latest negotiations in February 2024, the EU reported progress on intellectual property rights, but divergence on other key issues (European Commission 2024a). Agreement was reached in relation to several aspects of the sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) chapter, including agreement on processes regarding emergency measures, import checks, and listing of establishments. Agreement has also been reported in relation to the chapter on sustainable food systems. Discussions on trade and sustainable development are more complex, with significant divergences on many issues. The next round of negotiations will be held in Brussels after the Indian elections in May and June.
Indonesia
The EU and Indonesia are reported to be making “very good progress” in negotiations of an Indonesia-EU Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) (European Commission 2024b). Talks in February 2024 reached provisional agreement on three chapters including sustainable food systems, bringing the total of agreed chapters to 11 out of 20 (Jakarta Globe 2024). Discussions on trade and sustainable development have advanced, but there is disagreement on the scope and purpose of this chapter. Outstanding disagreements on import and export restrictions are also complicating the finalisation of agreement on market access. Nevertheless, there is optimism that these trade talks can be completed by the end of 2024 (ANTARA 2024).
Kenya
In February 2024, the European Parliament approved the EU-Kenya Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) signed in December 2023. The new agreement (European Commission 2023a, 2023b) can enter into force upon approval by the Council of the EU (Member States).
Once the EPA is in force, Kenya will be able to export all goods to the EU free of import tariffs. For most goods exported from the EU to Kenya (83% of current imports in value terms), import tariffs will be phased out gradually over the coming 15–25 years, except for a list of agricultural products including specific meat, fish, dairy products, fruit, vegetables, spices, rice, flours, and oils for which there will be no reduction in tariffs (Annex IId).
The EPA supports Kenya’s diversification of agricultural exports and the development of value-added agricultural products. It foresees the establishment of a Kenya–EU Agriculture Dialogue aimed at raising farm incomes, improving food security, sustainable use of resources, and rural development/economic growth (Art. 60).
The agreement also includes a chapter on sustainable agricultural development (Annex V) that aims to increase scrutiny of labour standards, gender equality, good environmental governance, and action on climate change/biodiversity. A domestic advisory group bringing together stakeholders (such as NGOs, business organisations, and trade unions) should advise on the implementation of the EPA. The European Commission describes this agreement as the “the most ambitious EU trade deal with a developing country when it comes to sustainability provisions such as climate and environmental protection and labour rights” (European Commission 2023c).
An earlier agreement previously agreed in 2016 between the EU and the East African Community (EAC) could not be implemented as not all EAC partner countries signed and ratified it. The EAC therefore allowed Kenya to move forward separately with a bilateral trade deal.
Philippines
In March 2024, the EU and the Philippines announced the official resumption of negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement (European Commission 2024c). Talks had been on hold since 2017 due to concerns about human rights under former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte. The EU is the Philippines fourth largest trade partner, while the Philippines is the EU’s seventh most important trading partner in the Indo-Pacific region. The Philippines is of particular interest to the EU due to major reserves of raw materials, including nickel, copper, and chromite, that are particularly relevant to green technologies.
The Philippines also has a pressing interest in securing a deal. Due to strong economic growth, the country is expected to soon be reclassified as an upper-middle-income country, meaning it would no longer be eligible for preferential access to the EU market under the EU’s General Scheme of Preferences (Euractiv 2023), potentially from 2028. The EU is aiming for a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement which, in addition to improved market access for agri-food products, includes discussions on more efficient SPS procedures, sustainable food systems, and protected geographical indications for agricultural products. The first round of negotiations is due to take place later this year.
Mercosur
The trade deal with Mercosur countries (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay) is one of the primary concerns raised by farmers protesting in Brussels over the past few months (Euractiv 2024a), and there has been little prospect of finalising the deal negotiated in 2019. No agreement has been reached yet on a protocol setting out additional commitments on stopping deforestation and protecting labour rights. EU Member States and the European Parliament have indicated that they will only approve the deal if stronger guarantees in these areas are given.
Further discussions were expected in February, but a visit to Brazil by European Commission Vice President Valdis Dombrovskis was cancelled. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has been particularly outspoken against the negotiated deal, calling for an “in-depth review of the European logic and approach” (Euractiv 2024b). No further progress in talks is expected before the European elections in June 2024.
See European Commission: Negotiations and agreements for “Overview of ongoing bilateral and regional negotiations” and “Map showing the state of play of EU trade agreements with third countries” (direct downloads, end of “In Focus” section).
EU trade policy
EU fails to agree new GSP rules
The EU institutions have failed to reach agreement on a Commission proposal for new rules for managing the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP), which establishes reduced tariffs for lower- and lower-middle-income countries. Negotiations collapsed in June 2023. The Council of the EU (Member States) attempted to agree new rules before the upcoming European elections in June 2024, but disagreements continued about linking less-developed countries’ access to the EU market to commitments on the readmission of migrants, and about mechanisms to limit imports of rice. See Extension of scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP).
As a result, the new European Parliament, to be elected in June 2024, will have to decide how to proceed with the Commission’s proposal.
EU reaches agreement on prohibition of products made with forced labour
The European Parliament and the Council of the EU have now reached an agreement on new rules to prohibit the sale of products (including agricultural products) made with forced labour. The new Regulation will establish information, investigation, and enforcement systems to prevent these products entering the EU market. The Regulation is expected in the second quarter of 2024. The new rules will apply from 2027. For further information, see Prohibition of products made with forced labour.
European Commission sets out EU’s agricultural trade vision
Amid farmer protests continuing in Brussels throughout January to March (Euractiv 2024a), and increasing calls by members of the European Parliament to ensure that imported products are produced in conditions that “mirror” those in the EU, European Commission Vice President Valdis Dombrovskis appeared before the European Parliament’s Agriculture Committee in February to discuss the impact of trade on EU agriculture. Criticism of alleged low-standard imports and trade deals negotiated by the European Commission are among the issues raised by protesting farmers.
In his speech (European Commission 2024d), Dombrovskis set out the Commission’s vision on agricultural trade:
- growth in EU agri-food exports and access to lower-cost inputs such as animal feed show that agricultural trade is good for Europe
- Europe’s farmers benefit from trade agreements such as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with Canada, which has led to EU pig meat and beef exports more than doubling
- including environmental conditions in trade agreements (e.g., liberalising trade of eggs with Mercosur if animal welfare is respected) or demanding certain production standards (as under the new EU Deforestation Regulation) can positively contribute to sustainable production
- all measures must be compliant with international commitments in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and “must be justified by global environmental reasons or ethical concerns, never by competitiveness concerns or level playing field considerations”.
“Graduation” of Bhutan from special EBA status
Bhutan benefits from the special arrangement for least-developed countries known as “Everything But Arms” (EBA) that provides duty-free and quota-free access to the EU market for all products except arms. Since December 2023, according to UN criteria Bhutan is no longer a least-developed country. This means that Bhutan no longer qualifies for EBA status under EU law.
Bhutan has 3 years to adjust to new trading relations with the EU. From 1 January 2028, the country will no longer benefit from the special arrangement, but it will still benefit from the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP). A proposed Regulation formalising this change has been put to the European Parliament and Council of the EU for approval.
EU supports WTO initiative to improve special and differential treatment
At the World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial Conference in February–March 2024, members agreed to the following initiatives to improve the capacity of WTO members that are developing countries to manage technical regulations that complicate trade in products, including agri-food products (WTO 2024).
- Improved training and technical assistance provided under the WTO Technical Assistance and Training Plan.
- Improved information on comment periods for notifications of new Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) and Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) measures.
- Enhanced implementation of special and differential treatment for developing-country WTO members in the SPS and TBT agreements.
These initiatives are supported by the EU (Decision 2024/998).
Commission report points to benefits of trade agreements for agri-food trade
A recent study by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (Ferrari et al. 2024) highlights benefits of free-trade agreements for both importers and exporters. It focuses on agreements that have been negotiated, but not yet implemented, with Australia, Chile, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mercosur (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay), Mexico, New Zealand, the Philippines, and Thailand. The study (summarised in European Commission 2024e) anticipates that implementation of these agreements would lead to an additional €3–4 billion of exports to the EU (an increase between 11 and 15%) for the countries concerned by 2032, compared with if these agreements are not implemented. The greatest growth in exports would be from Mercosur countries, with beef and veal, poultry, rice, and sugar sectors benefiting the most, and growth also in exports of cheese, pig meat, and sheep meat. Implementation would lead to a comparable increase in exports of EU agri-food products to those countries, meaning that the overall trade balance between the EU and the 10 trading partners would remain largely unaffected.
Resources
ANTARA (2024) IEU-CEPA: 17th negotiation round discusses trade barriers. ANTARA News, 2 March.
Euractiv (2023) Philippine trade minister hopes for EU free trade agreement before 2028. Euractiv, 29 June.
Euractiv (2024a) Map: farmers protests lead to concessions almost everywhere. Euractiv, 4 March.
Euractiv (2024b) EU-Mercosur trade agreement negotiations halted hours before signing, says Macron. Euractiv, 2 February.
European Commission (2023a) EU-Kenya: Text of the agreement.
European Commission (2023b) The EU-Kenya agreement explained.
European Commission (2023c) EU and Kenya conclude negotiations for an ambitious Economic Partnership Agreement with strong sustainability provision. Press release, 19 June.
European Commission (2024a) Report of the 7th round of negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and India.
European Commission (2024b) Report of the 17th round of negotiations for a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Indonesia.
European Commission (2024c) EU and the Philippines announce resumption of negotiations for a free trade agreement. Press release, 18 March.
European Commission (2024d) Opening statement by Executive Vice-President Valdis Dombrovskis at the meeting with the European Parliament AGRI Committee. Press corner, 12 February.
European Commission (2024e) Study confirms that EU trade opens new commercial opportunities for EU agri-food exporters. Press release, 22 February.
Ferrari, E., Elleby, C., De Jong, B. et al. (2024) Cumulative economic impact of upcoming trade agreements on EU agriculture. Publications Office of the European Union.
Jakarta Globe (2024) Indonesia still wants to secure EU trade pact this year. Jakarta Globe, 5 March.
Sources
European Commission: Negotiations and agreements
“Overview of ongoing bilateral and regional negotiations” and “Map showing the state of play of EU trade agreements with third countries” (direct downloads, end of “In Focus” section)
Disclaimer: Under no circumstances shall COLEAD be liable for any loss, damage, liability or expense incurred or suffered that is claimed to have resulted from the use of information available on this website or any link to external sites. The use of the website is at the user’s sole risk and responsibility. This information platform was created and maintained with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents do not, however, reflect the views of the European Union.